Skip to Content
Judiciary of the US Virgin Islands
Supreme Court
Superior Court
Supreme Court
of the
Virgin Islands
A+
A-
{1}
##LOC[OK]##
Judicial Home
Superior Court
About Us
Justices
Chief Justice Rhys S. Hodge
Associate Justice Maria M. Cabret
Associate Justice Ive Arlington Swan
Associate Justice Harold W.L. Willocks
Hours and Locations
Holidays
Contact Us
Administration
Offices of the Court
Office of Bar Admissions
Overview
Committee of Bar Examiners
Regular Admissions
Special Admissions
Pro Hac Vice Admissions
Bar Schedule of Fees
Office of the Clerk
Promulgation and Administrative Orders
Self Help Guide
Fee Schedule
Forms
Contact Us
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Members of Discipline Boards
Attorney Discipline
Judicial Discipline
Unauthorized Practice of Law
Attorney Registration
Contact Us
Rules
Opinions
Oral Arguments Calendar
Court Calendars
Archived Court Calendars
Current Court Calendars
Judicial Home
Superior Court
About Us
Justices
Chief Justice Rhys S. Hodge
Associate Justice Maria M. Cabret
Associate Justice Ive Arlington Swan
Associate Justice Harold W.L. Willocks
Hours and Locations
Holidays
Contact Us
Administration
Offices of the Court
Office of Bar Admissions
Overview
Committee of Bar Examiners
Regular Admissions
Special Admissions
Pro Hac Vice Admissions
Bar Schedule of Fees
Office of the Clerk
Promulgation and Administrative Orders
Self Help Guide
Fee Schedule
Forms
Contact Us
Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Members of Discipline Boards
Attorney Discipline
Judicial Discipline
Unauthorized Practice of Law
Attorney Registration
Contact Us
Rules
Opinions
Oral Arguments Calendar
Court Calendars
Archived Court Calendars
Current Court Calendars
MENU
Supreme Court of the US Virgin Islands
»
Court Opinions
»
Published Opinions
»
2018 Published Opinions
»
S. Ct. Civ. No. 2017-0101
A+
A-
S. Ct. Civ. No. 2017-0101
Sub Menu
Skip Sidebar Navigation
S. Ct. Civ. No. 2017-0101
S. Ct. Crim. No. 2017-0043
Last item for navigation
Case Caption:
Yearwood Enterprises, Inc. v. Antilles Gas Corp.
Case Number:
S. Ct. Civ. No. 2017-0101
Date:
10/03/2018
Author:
Cabret, Maria M.
Citation:
Summary:
An infant’s guardian ad litem filed a petition for a supervisory writ of mandamus, as well as a subsequent appeal, arguing that the Superior Court compromised her role as a guardian. Although this Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal – because the issues raised are not shown to be inextricably intertwined with the granting or dissolving of an injunction – it has jurisdiction over the petition for writ of mandamus in accord with 4 V.I.C. § 32(b). While this case is not appropriate for a supervisory writ of mandamus, the guardian has met the three-factor test applicable to traditional petitions for writ of mandamus, by demonstrating a clear and indisputable right to relief, and there are no other avenues for obtaining timely relief exist; a foster placement could negatively affect the infant by the time the case becomes appealable. A writ of mandamus is appropriate here. The Superior Court ignored an unambiguous statute that grants the guardian ad litem access to the home study and the prospective foster parent’s file, although the records sought are clearly reports relevant to the case under 5 V.I.C. § 2542. Additionally, it is imperative to correct the Superior Court’s overly restrictive understanding of a guardian ad litem’s role in child and neglect proceedings, so that the best interests of this infant and similarly situated children are not negatively affected by the Superior Court’s misinterpretation. The petition is granted in part, the Superior Court’s order is vacated, and a writ is issued compelling the Superior Court to allow the guardian ad litem access to pre-placement home study records and information in the prospective foster parent’s file. A writ of mandamus is denied with respect to a subpoena duces tecum, since the guardian failed to meet her burden of demonstrating that she lacks other methods of obtaining the same relief .
Attachment:
Open Document or Opinion